Tipiṭaka / Tipiṭaka (English) / Saṁyutta Nikāya, English translation |
संयुत्त निकाय १२।२४
Saṁyutta Nikāya 12.24
The Related Suttas Collection 12.24
३। दसबलवग्ग
3. Dasabalavagga
3. The Ten Powers
अञ्ञतित्थियसुत्त
Aññatitthiyasutta
Followers of Other Religions
राजगहे विहरति वेळुवने। अथ खो आयस्मा सारिपुत्तो पुब्बण्हसमयं निवासेत्वा पत्तचीवरमादाय राजगहं पिण्डाय पाविसि। अथ खो आयस्मतो सारिपुत्तस्स एतदहोसि: “अतिप्पगो खो ताव राजगहे पिण्डाय चरितुं। यन्नूनाहं येन अञ्ञतित्थियानं परिब्बाजकानं आरामो तेनुपसङ्कमेय्यन्”ति।
Rājagahe viharati veḷuvane. Atha kho āyasmā sāriputto pubbaṇhasamayaṁ nivāsetvā pattacīvaramādāya rājagahaṁ piṇḍāya pāvisi. Atha kho āyasmato sāriputtassa etadahosi: “atippago kho tāva rājagahe piṇḍāya carituṁ. Yannūnāhaṁ yena aññatitthiyānaṁ paribbājakānaṁ ārāmo tenupasaṅkameyyan”ti.
Near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove. Then Venerable Sāriputta robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Rājagaha for alms. Then it occurred to him, “It’s too early to wander for alms in Rājagaha. Why don’t I go to the monastery of the wanderers of other religions?”
अथ खो आयस्मा सारिपुत्तो येन अञ्ञतित्थियानं परिब्बाजकानं आरामो तेनुपसङ्कमि; उपसङ्कमित्वा तेहि अञ्ञतित्थियेहि परिब्बाजकेहि सद्धिं सम्मोदि। सम्मोदनीयं कथं सारणीयं वीतिसारेत्वा एकमन्तं निसीदि। एकमन्तं निसिन्नं खो आयस्मन्तं सारिपुत्तं ते अञ्ञतित्थिया परिब्बाजका एतदवोचुं:
Atha kho āyasmā sāriputto yena aññatitthiyānaṁ paribbājakānaṁ ārāmo tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā tehi aññatitthiyehi paribbājakehi saddhiṁ sammodi. Sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi. Ekamantaṁ nisinnaṁ kho āyasmantaṁ sāriputtaṁ te aññatitthiyā paribbājakā etadavocuṁ:
Then he went to the monastery of the wanderers of other religions, and exchanged greetings with the wanderers there. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side. The wanderers said to him:
“सन्तावुसो सारिपुत्त, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। सन्ति पनावुसो सारिपुत्त, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा परङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। सन्तावुसो सारिपुत्त, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतञ्च परङ्कतञ्च दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। सन्ति पनावुसो सारिपुत्त, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। इध, पनावुसो सारिपुत्त, समणो गोतमो किंवादी किमक्खायी? कथं ब्याकरमाना च मयं वुत्तवादिनो चेव समणस्स गोतमस्स अस्साम, न च समणं गोतमं अभूतेन अब्भाचिक्खेय्याम, धम्मस्स चानुधम्मं ब्याकरेय्याम, न च कोचि सहधम्मिको वादानुपातो गारय्हं ठानं आगच्छेय्या”ति?
“Santāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Santi panāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā paraṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Santāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkatañca paraṅkatañca dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Santi panāvuso sāriputta, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Idha, panāvuso sāriputta, samaṇo gotamo kiṁvādī kimakkhāyī? Kathaṁ byākaramānā ca mayaṁ vuttavādino ceva samaṇassa gotamassa assāma, na ca samaṇaṁ gotamaṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyyāma, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyyāma, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyyā”ti?
“Friend Sāriputta, there are ascetics and brahmins who teach the efficacy of deeds. Some of them declare that suffering is made by oneself. Some of them declare that suffering is made by another. Some of them declare that suffering is made by both oneself and another. Some of them declare that suffering arises by chance, not made by oneself or another. What does the ascetic Gotama say about this? How does he explain it? How should we answer so as to repeat what the ascetic Gotama has said, and not misrepresent him with an untruth? How should we explain in line with his teaching, with no legitimate grounds for rebuke and criticism?”
“पटिच्चसमुप्पन्नं खो, आवुसो, दुक्खं वुत्तं भगवता। किं पटिच्च? फस्सं पटिच्च। इति वदं वुत्तवादी चेव भगवतो अस्स, न च भगवन्तं अभूतेन अब्भाचिक्खेय्य, धम्मस्स चानुधम्मं ब्याकरेय्य, न च कोचि सहधम्मिको वादानुपातो गारय्हं ठानं आगच्छेय्य।
“Paṭiccasamuppannaṁ kho, āvuso, dukkhaṁ vuttaṁ bhagavatā. Kiṁ paṭicca? Phassaṁ paṭicca. Iti vadaṁ vuttavādī ceva bhagavato assa, na ca bhagavantaṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyya, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyya, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyya.
“Friends, the Buddha said that suffering is dependently originated. Dependent on what? Dependent on contact. If you said this you would repeat what the Buddha has said, and not misrepresent him with an untruth. You would explain in line with his teaching, and there would be no legitimate grounds for rebuke and criticism.
तत्रावुसो, ये ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया। येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा परङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया। येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतञ्च परङ्कतञ्च दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया। येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया।
Tatrāvuso, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā. Yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā paraṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā. Yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkatañca paraṅkatañca dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā. Yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā.
Consider the ascetics and brahmins who teach the efficacy of deeds. In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by oneself, that’s conditioned by contact. In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by another, that’s also conditioned by contact. In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by oneself and another, that’s also conditioned by contact. In the case of those who declare that suffering arises by chance, not made by oneself or another, that’s also conditioned by contact.
तत्रावुसो, ये ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जति। येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा परङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जति। येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतञ्च परङ्कतञ्च दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जति। येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जती”ति।
Tatrāvuso, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati. Yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā paraṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati. Yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkatañca paraṅkatañca dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati. Yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjatī”ti.
Consider the ascetics and brahmins who teach the efficacy of deeds. In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by oneself, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact. In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by another, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact. In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by oneself and another, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact. In the case of those who declare that suffering arises by chance, not made by oneself or another, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact.”
अस्सोसि खो आयस्मा आनन्दो आयस्मतो सारिपुत्तस्स तेहि अञ्ञतित्थियेहि परिब्बाजकेहि सद्धिं इमं कथासल्लापं। अथ खो आयस्मा आनन्दो राजगहे पिण्डाय चरित्वा पच्छाभत्तं पिण्डपातपटिक्कन्तो येन भगवा तेनुपसङ्कमि; उपसङ्कमित्वा भगवन्तं अभिवादेत्वा एकमन्तं निसीदि। एकमन्तं निसिन्नो खो आयस्मा आनन्दो यावतको आयस्मतो सारिपुत्तस्स तेहि अञ्ञतित्थियेहि परिब्बाजकेहि सद्धिं अहोसि कथासल्लापो तं सब्बं भगवतो आरोचेसि।
Assosi kho āyasmā ānando āyasmato sāriputtassa tehi aññatitthiyehi paribbājakehi saddhiṁ imaṁ kathāsallāpaṁ. Atha kho āyasmā ānando rājagahe piṇḍāya caritvā pacchābhattaṁ piṇḍapātapaṭikkanto yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi. Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho āyasmā ānando yāvatako āyasmato sāriputtassa tehi aññatitthiyehi paribbājakehi saddhiṁ ahosi kathāsallāpo taṁ sabbaṁ bhagavato ārocesi.
Venerable Ānanda heard this discussion between Venerable Sāriputta and those wanderers of other religions. Then Ānanda wandered for alms in Rājagaha. After the meal, on his return from almsround, he went to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and informed the Buddha of all they had discussed.
“साधु साधु, आनन्द, यथा तं सारिपुत्तो सम्मा ब्याकरमानो ब्याकरेय्य। पटिच्चसमुप्पन्नं खो, आनन्द, दुक्खं वुत्तं मया। किं पटिच्च? फस्सं पटिच्च। इति वदं वुत्तवादी चेव मे अस्स, न च मं अभूतेन अब्भाचिक्खेय्य, धम्मस्स चानुधम्मं ब्याकरेय्य, न च कोचि सहधम्मिको वादानुपातो गारय्हं ठानं आगच्छेय्य।
“Sādhu sādhu, ānanda, yathā taṁ sāriputto sammā byākaramāno byākareyya. Paṭiccasamuppannaṁ kho, ānanda, dukkhaṁ vuttaṁ mayā. Kiṁ paṭicca? Phassaṁ paṭicca. Iti vadaṁ vuttavādī ceva me assa, na ca maṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyya, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyya, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyya.
“Good, good, Ānanda! It’s just as Sāriputta has so rightly explained. I have said that suffering is dependently originated. Dependent on what? Dependent on contact. Saying this you would repeat what I have said, and not misrepresent me with an untruth. You would explain in line with my teaching, and there would be no legitimate grounds for rebuke and criticism.
तत्रानन्द, ये ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया। येपि ते …पे… येपि ते …पे… येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया।
Tatrānanda, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā. Yepi te …pe… yepi te …pe… yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā.
Consider the ascetics and brahmins who teach the efficacy of deeds. In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by oneself, that’s conditioned by contact. … In the case of those who declare that suffering arises by chance, not made by oneself or another, that’s also conditioned by contact.
तत्रानन्द, येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जति। येपि ते …पे… येपि ते …पे… येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जति।
Tatrānanda, yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati. Yepi te …pe… yepi te …pe… yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati.
In the case of those who declare that suffering is made by oneself, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact. … In the case of those who declare that suffering arises by chance, not made by oneself or another, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact.
एकमिदाहं, आनन्द, समयं इधेव राजगहे विहरामि वेळुवने कलन्दकनिवापे। अथ ख्वाहं, आनन्द, पुब्बण्हसमयं निवासेत्वा पत्तचीवरमादाय राजगहं पिण्डाय पाविसिं। तस्स मय्हं, आनन्द, एतदहोसि: ‘अतिप्पगो खो ताव राजगहे पिण्डाय चरितुं। यन्नूनाहं येन अञ्ञतित्थियानं परिब्बाजकानं आरामो तेनुपसङ्कमेय्यन्ऽति।
Ekamidāhaṁ, ānanda, samayaṁ idheva rājagahe viharāmi veḷuvane kalandakanivāpe. Atha khvāhaṁ, ānanda, pubbaṇhasamayaṁ nivāsetvā pattacīvaramādāya rājagahaṁ piṇḍāya pāvisiṁ. Tassa mayhaṁ, ānanda, etadahosi: ‘atippago kho tāva rājagahe piṇḍāya carituṁ. Yannūnāhaṁ yena aññatitthiyānaṁ paribbājakānaṁ ārāmo tenupasaṅkameyyan’ti.
Ānanda, this one time I was staying near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground. Then I robed up in the morning and, taking my bowl and robe, entered Rājagaha for alms. Then I thought: ‘It’s too early to wander for alms in Rājagaha. Why don’t I go to the monastery of the wanderers of other religions?’
अथ ख्वाहं, आनन्द, येन अञ्ञतित्थियानं परिब्बाजकानं आरामो तेनुपसङ्कमिं; उपसङ्कमित्वा तेहि अञ्ञतित्थियेहि परिब्बाजकेहि सद्धिं सम्मोदिं। सम्मोदनीयं कथं सारणीयं वीतिसारेत्वा एकमन्तं निसीदिं। एकमन्तं निसिन्नं खो मं, आनन्द, ते अञ्ञतित्थिया परिब्बाजका एतदवोचुं:
Atha khvāhaṁ, ānanda, yena aññatitthiyānaṁ paribbājakānaṁ ārāmo tenupasaṅkamiṁ; upasaṅkamitvā tehi aññatitthiyehi paribbājakehi saddhiṁ sammodiṁ. Sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ nisīdiṁ. Ekamantaṁ nisinnaṁ kho maṁ, ānanda, te aññatitthiyā paribbājakā etadavocuṁ:
Then I went to the monastery of the wanderers of other religions, and exchanged greetings with the wanderers there. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, I sat down to one side. …”
‘सन्तावुसो गोतम, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। सन्ति पनावुसो गोतम, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा परङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। सन्तावुसो गोतम, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतञ्च परङ्कतञ्च दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। सन्ति पनावुसो गोतम, एके समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति। इध नो आयस्मा गोतमो किंवादी किमक्खायी? कथं ब्याकरमाना च मयं वुत्तवादिनो चेव आयस्मतो गोतमस्स अस्साम, न च आयस्मन्तं गोतमं अभूतेन अब्भाचिक्खेय्याम, धम्मस्स चानुधम्मं ब्याकरेय्याम, न च कोचि सहधम्मिको वादानुपातो गारय्हं ठानं आगच्छेय्याऽति?
‘Santāvuso gotama, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Santi panāvuso gotama, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā paraṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Santāvuso gotama, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkatañca paraṅkatañca dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Santi panāvuso gotama, eke samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti. Idha no āyasmā gotamo kiṁvādī kimakkhāyī? Kathaṁ byākaramānā ca mayaṁ vuttavādino ceva āyasmato gotamassa assāma, na ca āyasmantaṁ gotamaṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyyāma, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyyāma, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyyā’ti?
(The wanderers asked the Buddha the very same questions, and he gave the same answers.)
एवं वुत्ताहं, आनन्द, ते अञ्ञतित्थिये परिब्बाजके एतदवोचं: ‘पटिच्चसमुप्पन्नं खो, आवुसो, दुक्खं वुत्तं मया। किं पटिच्च? फस्सं पटिच्च। इति वदं वुत्तवादी चेव मे अस्स, न च मं अभूतेन अब्भाचिक्खेय्य, धम्मस्स चानुधम्मं ब्याकरेय्य, न च कोचि सहधम्मिको वादानुपातो गारय्हं ठानं आगच्छेय्याति।
Evaṁ vuttāhaṁ, ānanda, te aññatitthiye paribbājake etadavocaṁ: ‘paṭiccasamuppannaṁ kho, āvuso, dukkhaṁ vuttaṁ mayā. Kiṁ paṭicca? Phassaṁ paṭicca. Iti vadaṁ vuttavādī ceva me assa, na ca maṁ abhūtena abbhācikkheyya, dhammassa cānudhammaṁ byākareyya, na ca koci sahadhammiko vādānupāto gārayhaṁ ṭhānaṁ āgaccheyyāti.
तत्रावुसो, ये ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया। येपि ते …पे… येपि ते …पे… येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति तदपि फस्सपच्चया।
Tatrāvuso, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā. Yepi te …pe… yepi te …pe… yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti tadapi phassapaccayā.
तत्रावुसो, ये ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा सयङ्कतं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जति। येपि ते …पे… येपि ते …पे… येपि ते समणब्राह्मणा कम्मवादा असयङ्कारं अपरङ्कारं अधिच्चसमुप्पन्नं दुक्खं पञ्ञपेन्ति, ते वत अञ्ञत्र फस्सा पटिसंवेदिस्सन्तीति नेतं ठानं विज्जतीऽ”ति।
Tatrāvuso, ye te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā sayaṅkataṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati. Yepi te …pe… yepi te …pe… yepi te samaṇabrāhmaṇā kammavādā asayaṅkāraṁ aparaṅkāraṁ adhiccasamuppannaṁ dukkhaṁ paññapenti, te vata aññatra phassā paṭisaṁvedissantīti netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjatī’”ti.
“अच्छरियं भन्ते, अब्भुतं भन्ते। यत्र हि नाम एकेन पदेन सब्बो अत्थो वुत्तो भविस्सति। सिया नु खो, भन्ते, एसेवत्थो वित्थारेन वुच्चमानो गम्भीरो चेव अस्स गम्भीरावभासो चा”ति?
“Acchariyaṁ bhante, abbhutaṁ bhante. Yatra hi nāma ekena padena sabbo attho vutto bhavissati. Siyā nu kho, bhante, esevattho vitthārena vuccamāno gambhīro ceva assa gambhīrāvabhāso cā”ti?
“It’s incredible, sir, it’s amazing, how the whole matter is stated with one phrase. Could there be a detailed explanation of this matter that is both deep and appears deep?”
“तेन हानन्द, तञ्ञेवेत्थ पटिभातू”ति।
“Tena hānanda, taññevettha paṭibhātū”ti.
“Well then, Ānanda, clarify this matter yourself.”
“सचे मं, भन्ते, एवं पुच्छेय्युं: ‘जरामरणं, आवुसो आनन्द, किंनिदानं किंसमुदयं किंजातिकं किंपभवन्ऽति? एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यं: ‘जरामरणं खो, आवुसो, जातिनिदानं जातिसमुदयं जातिजातिकं जातिपभवन्ऽति। एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यं।
“Sace maṁ, bhante, evaṁ puccheyyuṁ: ‘jarāmaraṇaṁ, āvuso ānanda, kiṁnidānaṁ kiṁsamudayaṁ kiṁjātikaṁ kiṁpabhavan’ti? Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyaṁ: ‘jarāmaraṇaṁ kho, āvuso, jātinidānaṁ jātisamudayaṁ jātijātikaṁ jātipabhavan’ti. Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyaṁ.
“Sir, suppose they were to ask me: ‘Friend Ānanda, what is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of old age and death?’ I’d answer like this: ‘Friends, rebirth is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of old age and death.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.
सचे मं, भन्ते, एवं पुच्छेय्युं: ‘जाति पनावुसो आनन्द, किंनिदाना किंसमुदया किंजातिका किंपभवाऽति? एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यं: ‘जाति खो, आवुसो, भवनिदाना भवसमुदया भवजातिका भवप्पभवाऽति। एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यं।
Sace maṁ, bhante, evaṁ puccheyyuṁ: ‘jāti panāvuso ānanda, kiṁnidānā kiṁsamudayā kiṁjātikā kiṁpabhavā’ti? Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyaṁ: ‘jāti kho, āvuso, bhavanidānā bhavasamudayā bhavajātikā bhavappabhavā’ti. Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyaṁ.
Suppose they were to ask me: ‘What is the source of rebirth?’ I’d answer like this: ‘Continued existence is the source of rebirth.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.
सचे मं, भन्ते, एवं पुच्छेय्युं: ‘भवो पनावुसो आनन्द, किंनिदानो किंसमुदयो किंजातिको किंपभवोऽति? एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यं: ‘भवो खो, आवुसो, उपादाननिदानो उपादानसमुदयो उपादानजातिको उपादानप्पभवोऽति। एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यं।
Sace maṁ, bhante, evaṁ puccheyyuṁ: ‘bhavo panāvuso ānanda, kiṁnidāno kiṁsamudayo kiṁjātiko kiṁpabhavo’ti? Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyaṁ: ‘bhavo kho, āvuso, upādānanidāno upādānasamudayo upādānajātiko upādānappabhavo’ti. Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyaṁ.
Suppose they were to ask me: ‘What is the source of continued existence?’ I’d answer like this: ‘Grasping is the source of continued existence.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.
सचे मं, भन्ते, एवं पुच्छेय्युं—उपादानं पनावुसो …पे… तण्हा पनावुसो …पे… वेदना पनावुसो …पे… सचे मं, भन्ते, एवं पुच्छेय्युं: ‘फस्सो पनावुसो आनन्द, किंनिदानो किंसमुदयो किंजातिको किंपभवोऽति? एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यं: ‘फस्सो खो, आवुसो, सळायतननिदानो सळायतनसमुदयो सळायतनजातिको सळायतनप्पभवोऽति। ‘छन्नं त्वेव, आवुसो, फस्सायतनानं असेसविरागनिरोधा फस्सनिरोधो; फस्सनिरोधा वेदनानिरोधो; वेदनानिरोधा तण्हानिरोधो; तण्हानिरोधा उपादाननिरोधो; उपादाननिरोधा भवनिरोधो; भवनिरोधा जातिनिरोधो; जातिनिरोधा जरामरणं सोकपरिदेवदुक्खदोमनस्सुपायासा निरुज्झन्ति। एवमेतस्स केवलस्स दुक्खक्खन्धस्स निरोधो होतीऽति। एवं पुट्ठोहं, भन्ते, एवं ब्याकरेय्यन्”ति।
Sace maṁ, bhante, evaṁ puccheyyuṁ—upādānaṁ panāvuso …pe… taṇhā panāvuso …pe… vedanā panāvuso …pe… sace maṁ, bhante, evaṁ puccheyyuṁ: ‘phasso panāvuso ānanda, kiṁnidāno kiṁsamudayo kiṁjātiko kiṁpabhavo’ti? Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyaṁ: ‘phasso kho, āvuso, saḷāyatananidāno saḷāyatanasamudayo saḷāyatanajātiko saḷāyatanappabhavo’ti. ‘Channaṁ tveva, āvuso, phassāyatanānaṁ asesavirāganirodhā phassanirodho; phassanirodhā vedanānirodho; vedanānirodhā taṇhānirodho; taṇhānirodhā upādānanirodho; upādānanirodhā bhavanirodho; bhavanirodhā jātinirodho; jātinirodhā jarāmaraṇaṁ sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā nirujjhanti. Evametassa kevalassa dukkhakkhandhassa nirodho hotī’ti. Evaṁ puṭṭhohaṁ, bhante, evaṁ byākareyyan”ti.
Suppose they were to ask me: ‘What is the source of grasping?’ … craving … feeling … Suppose they were to ask me: ‘What is the source of contact?’ I’d answer like this: ‘The six sense fields are the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of contact.’ ‘When the six fields of contact fade away and cease with nothing left over, contact ceases. When contact ceases, feeling ceases. When feeling ceases, craving ceases. When craving ceases, grasping ceases. When grasping ceases, continued existence ceases. When continued existence ceases, rebirth ceases. When rebirth ceases, old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress cease. That is how this entire mass of suffering ceases.’ That’s how I’d answer such a question.”
चतुत्थं।
Catutthaṁ.
The authoritative text of the Saṁyutta Nikāya is the Pāli text. The English translation is provided as an aid to the study of the original Pāli text. [CREDITS »]