| Tipiṭaka / Tipiṭaka (English) / Majjhima Nikāya, English translation |
मज्झिम निकाय १४७
Majjhima Nikāya 147
The Middle-Length Suttas Collection 147
चूळराहुलोवादसुत्त
Cūḷarāhulovādasutta
The Shorter Advice to Rāhula
एवं मे सुतं—एकं समयं भगवा सावत्थियं विहरति जेतवने अनाथपिण्डिकस्स आरामे।
Evaṁ me sutaṁ—ekaṁ samayaṁ bhagavā sāvatthiyaṁ viharati jetavane anāthapiṇḍikassa ārāme.
So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.
अथ खो भगवतो रहोगतस्स पटिसल्लीनस्स एवं चेतसो परिवितक्को उदपादि: “परिपक्का खो राहुलस्स विमुत्तिपरिपाचनीया धम्मा। यन्नूनाहं राहुलं उत्तरिं आसवानं खये विनेय्यन्”ति।
Atha kho bhagavato rahogatassa paṭisallīnassa evaṁ cetaso parivitakko udapādi: “paripakkā kho rāhulassa vimuttiparipācanīyā dhammā. Yannūnāhaṁ rāhulaṁ uttariṁ āsavānaṁ khaye vineyyan”ti.
Then as he was in private retreat this thought came to his mind, “The qualities that ripen in freedom have ripened in Rāhula. Why don’t I lead him further to the ending of defilements?”
अथ खो भगवा पुब्बण्हसमयं निवासेत्वा पत्तचीवरमादाय सावत्थिं पिण्डाय पाविसि।
Atha kho bhagavā pubbaṇhasamayaṁ nivāsetvā pattacīvaramādāya sāvatthiṁ piṇḍāya pāvisi.
Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Sāvatthī for alms.
सावत्थियं पिण्डाय चरित्वा पच्छाभत्तं पिण्डपातपटिक्कन्तो आयस्मन्तं राहुलं आमन्तेसि: “गण्हाहि, राहुल, निसीदनं; येन अन्धवनं तेनुपसङ्कमिस्साम दिवाविहाराया”ति।
Sāvatthiyaṁ piṇḍāya caritvā pacchābhattaṁ piṇḍapātapaṭikkanto āyasmantaṁ rāhulaṁ āmantesi: “gaṇhāhi, rāhula, nisīdanaṁ; yena andhavanaṁ tenupasaṅkamissāma divāvihārāyā”ti.
Then, after the meal, on his return from almsround, he addressed Venerable Rāhula, “Rāhula, get your sitting cloth. Let’s go to the Dark Forest for the day’s meditation.”
“एवं, भन्ते”ति खो आयस्मा राहुलो भगवतो पटिस्सुत्वा निसीदनं आदाय भगवन्तं पिट्ठितो पिट्ठितो अनुबन्धि।
“Evaṁ, bhante”ti kho āyasmā rāhulo bhagavato paṭissutvā nisīdanaṁ ādāya bhagavantaṁ piṭṭhito piṭṭhito anubandhi.
“Yes, sir,” replied Rāhula. Taking his sitting cloth he followed behind the Buddha.
तेन खो पन समयेन अनेकानि देवतासहस्सानि भगवन्तं अनुबन्धानि होन्ति: “अज्ज भगवा आयस्मन्तं राहुलं उत्तरिं आसवानं खये विनेस्सती”ति।
Tena kho pana samayena anekāni devatāsahassāni bhagavantaṁ anubandhāni honti: “ajja bhagavā āyasmantaṁ rāhulaṁ uttariṁ āsavānaṁ khaye vinessatī”ti.
Now at that time many thousands of deities followed the Buddha, thinking, “Today the Buddha will lead Rāhula further to the ending of defilements!”
अथ खो भगवा अन्धवनं अज्झोगाहेत्वा अञ्ञतरस्मिं रुक्खमूले पञ्ञत्ते आसने निसीदि। आयस्मापि खो राहुलो भगवन्तं अभिवादेत्वा एकमन्तं निसीदि। एकमन्तं निसिन्नं खो आयस्मन्तं राहुलं भगवा एतदवोच:
Atha kho bhagavā andhavanaṁ ajjhogāhetvā aññatarasmiṁ rukkhamūle paññatte āsane nisīdi. Āyasmāpi kho rāhulo bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi. Ekamantaṁ nisinnaṁ kho āyasmantaṁ rāhulaṁ bhagavā etadavoca:
Then the Buddha plunged deep into the Dark Forest and sat at the root of a tree on the seat spread out. Rāhula bowed to the Buddha and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him:
“तं किं मञ्ञसि, राहुल, चक्खु निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, rāhula, cakkhu niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Is the eye permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चं, भन्ते”।
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि, राहुल, रूपा निच्चा वा अनिच्चा वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, rāhula, rūpā niccā vā aniccā vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Are sights permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चा, भन्ते”।
“Aniccā, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if they're impermanent, are they suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if they're impermanent, suffering, and perishable, are they fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि, राहुल, चक्खुविञ्ञाणं निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, rāhula, cakkhuviññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Is eye consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चं, भन्ते”।
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि, राहुल, चक्खुसम्फस्सो निच्चो वा अनिच्चो वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, rāhula, cakkhusamphasso nicco vā anicco vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Is eye contact permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चो, भन्ते”।
“Anicco, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि, राहुल, यमिदं चक्खुसम्फस्सपच्चया उप्पज्जति वेदनागतं सञ्ञागतं सङ्खारगतं विञ्ञाणगतं तम्पि निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, rāhula, yamidaṁ1 cakkhusamphassapaccayā uppajjati vedanāgataṁ saññāgataṁ saṅkhāragataṁ viññāṇagataṁ tampi niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises conditioned by eye contact: is that permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चं, भन्ते”।
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि राहुल, सोतं निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति? “अनिच्चं, भन्ते …पे… घानं निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति? “अनिच्चं, भन्ते …पे… जिव्हा निच्चा वा अनिच्चा वा”ति? “अनिच्चा, भन्ते … कायो निच्चो वा अनिच्चो वा”ति? “अनिच्चो, भन्ते … मनो निच्चो वा अनिच्चो वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi rāhula, sotaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti? “Aniccaṁ, bhante …pe… ghānaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti? “Aniccaṁ, bhante …pe… jivhā niccā vā aniccā vā”ti? “Aniccā, bhante … kāyo nicco vā anicco vā”ti? “Anicco, bhante … mano nicco vā anicco vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Is the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चो, भन्ते”।
“Anicco, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि राहुल, धम्मा निच्चा वा अनिच्चा वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi rāhula, dhammā niccā vā aniccā vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Are thoughts permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चा, भन्ते”।
“Aniccā, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if they're impermanent, are they suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if they're impermanent, suffering, and perishable, are they fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि राहुल, मनोविञ्ञाणं निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi rāhula, manoviññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Is mind consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चं, भन्ते”।
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि राहुल, मनोसम्फस्सो निच्चो वा अनिच्चो वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi rāhula, manosamphasso nicco vā anicco vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Is mind contact permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चो, भन्ते”।
“Anicco, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं, कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“तं किं मञ्ञसि, राहुल, यमिदं मनोसम्फस्सपच्चया उप्पज्जति वेदनागतं सञ्ञागतं सङ्खारगतं विञ्ञाणगतं, तम्पि निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति?
“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, rāhula, yamidaṁ manosamphassapaccayā uppajjati vedanāgataṁ saññāgataṁ saṅkhāragataṁ viññāṇagataṁ, tampi niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“What do you think, Rāhula? Anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises conditioned by mind contact: is that permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चं, भन्ते”।
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं वा तं सुखं वा”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“दुक्खं, भन्ते”।
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“यं पनानिच्चं दुक्खं विपरिणामधम्मं कल्लं नु तं समनुपस्सितुं: ‘एतं मम, एसोहमस्मि, एसो मे अत्ताऽ”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“एवं पस्सं, राहुल, सुतवा अरियसावको चक्खुस्मिं निब्बिन्दति, रूपेसु निब्बिन्दति, चक्खुविञ्ञाणे निब्बिन्दति, चक्खुसम्फस्से निब्बिन्दति, यमिदं चक्खुसम्फस्सपच्चया उप्पज्जति वेदनागतं सञ्ञागतं सङ्खारगतं विञ्ञाणगतं तस्मिम्पि निब्बिन्दति। सोतस्मिं निब्बिन्दति, सद्देसु निब्बिन्दति …पे… घानस्मिं निब्बिन्दति, गन्धेसु निब्बिन्दति … जिव्हाय निब्बिन्दति, रसेसु निब्बिन्दति … कायस्मिं निब्बिन्दति, फोट्ठब्बेसु निब्बिन्दति … मनस्मिं निब्बिन्दति, धम्मेसु निब्बिन्दति, मनोविञ्ञाणे निब्बिन्दति, मनोसम्फस्से निब्बिन्दति, यमिदं मनोसम्फस्सपच्चया उप्पज्जति वेदनागतं सञ्ञागतं सङ्खारगतं विञ्ञाणगतं तस्मिम्पि निब्बिन्दति। निब्बिन्दं विरज्जति, विरागा विमुच्चति। विमुत्तस्मिं विमुत्तमिति ञाणं होति।
“Evaṁ passaṁ, rāhula, sutavā ariyasāvako cakkhusmiṁ2 nibbindati, rūpesu nibbindati, cakkhuviññāṇe nibbindati, cakkhusamphasse nibbindati, yamidaṁ cakkhusamphassapaccayā uppajjati vedanāgataṁ saññāgataṁ saṅkhāragataṁ viññāṇagataṁ tasmimpi nibbindati. Sotasmiṁ nibbindati, saddesu nibbindati …pe… ghānasmiṁ nibbindati, gandhesu nibbindati … jivhāya nibbindati, rasesu nibbindati … kāyasmiṁ nibbindati, phoṭṭhabbesu nibbindati … manasmiṁ nibbindati, dhammesu nibbindati, manoviññāṇe nibbindati, manosamphasse nibbindati, yamidaṁ manosamphassapaccayā uppajjati vedanāgataṁ saññāgataṁ saṅkhāragataṁ viññāṇagataṁ tasmimpi nibbindati. Nibbindaṁ virajjati, virāgā vimuccati. Vimuttasmiṁ vimuttamiti ñāṇaṁ hoti.
“Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with the eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact. And they grow disillusioned with anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises conditioned by eye contact. They grow disillusioned with the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind, thoughts, mind consciousness, and mind contact. And they grow disillusioned with anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises conditioned by mind contact. Being disillusioned, desire fades away. When desire fades away they’re freed. When they’re freed, they know they’re freed.
‘खीणा जाति, वुसितं ब्रह्मचरियं, कतं करणीयं, नापरं इत्थत्तायाऽति पजानाती”ति।
‘Khīṇā jāti, vusitaṁ brahmacariyaṁ, kataṁ karaṇīyaṁ, nāparaṁ itthattāyā’ti pajānātī”ti.
They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is no return to any state of existence.’”
इदमवोच भगवा। अत्तमनो आयस्मा राहुलो भगवतो भासितं अभिनन्दीति। इमस्मिञ्च पन वेय्याकरणस्मिं भञ्ञमाने आयस्मतो राहुलस्स अनुपादाय आसवेहि चित्तं विमुच्चि।
Idamavoca bhagavā. Attamano āyasmā rāhulo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinandīti. Imasmiñca pana veyyākaraṇasmiṁ bhaññamāne āyasmato rāhulassa anupādāya āsavehi cittaṁ vimucci.
That is what the Buddha said. Satisfied, Venerable Rāhula was happy with what the Buddha said. And while this discourse was being spoken, Rāhula’s mind was freed from defilements by not grasping.
तासञ्च अनेकानं देवतासहस्सानं विरजं वीतमलं धम्मचक्खुं उदपादि: “यं किञ्चि समुदयधम्मं सब्बं तं निरोधधम्मन्”ति।
Tāsañca anekānaṁ devatāsahassānaṁ virajaṁ vītamalaṁ dhammacakkhuṁ udapādi: “yaṁ kiñci samudayadhammaṁ sabbaṁ taṁ nirodhadhamman”ti.
And the stainless, immaculate vision of the Dhamma arose in those thousands of deities: “Everything that has a beginning has an end.”
चूळराहुलोवादसुत्तं निट्ठितं पञ्चमं।
Cūḷarāhulovādasuttaṁ niṭṭhitaṁ pañcamaṁ.
The authoritative text of the Majjhima Nikāya is the Pāli text. The English translation is provided as an aid to the study of the original Pāli text. [CREDITS »]
Footnotes:
